By Sam Dykstra/DFP StaffOffense: DYou’re probably looking at the final score and thinking. “How can a team that scored five goals ever get a grade as low as a D?” Easy. The game was over by the time the Terriers scored four of their five goals – all of which came in a third period that started with BU down 6-1 – and BU coach Jack Parker acknowledged as such after the game. The real issues came early as BU attempted only 11 shots in the first 40 minutes compared to 27 for BC. The shots chart for the second period, in which the Terriers only attempted 11 shots with six of them reaching the goalie, looked more like one from a five-minute overtime period than a 20-minute second period. Freshman forward Mat Nieto’s wrist shot on a two-on-one in the second was the only thing that kept Friday night’s game from becoming even more of a laugher after two periods. After that, nothing else mattered. Defense: FThe 9 next to BC speaks for itself. You have to go all the way back March 1, 2002 (a 9-6 loss to University of Maine at home) for the last time BU gave up that many goals in any game and about 25 years to find the last time BC tallied that many against its Comm. Ave. rival. The low point probably came when sophomore defenseman Sean Escobedo forced the puck into the BU crease. Junior goalie Grant Rollheiser let the puck escape him, and BC forward Bill Arnold took advantage, putting home BC’s eight goal of the night on what may have been the easiest goal he’ll ever score. Now, the Terriers are left to hope that the next time a team in scarlet and white allows nine goals won’t be for another eight seasons, when they’re all graduated or in the professional ranks.Goaltending: Kieran Millan – F, Grant Rollheiser – FYou can read Jake’s sider on Friday’s goaltending situation here, but it’s easy to see how the two juniors “earned” their failing grades. Millan (10 saves) was the softest he’s ever looked in 2010 – both this semester and last – albeit in just one period of play. His worst moment came when his glove missed a lazy wrister from BC forward Paul Carey. Parker hoped that bringing in Rollheiser (18 saves) would lead to more inspired play, both in net and everywhere else on the ice, but that never transpired as the team’s second option did little to stem the BC offensive wave. That being said, it’s easy to blame the loss on the two netminders, but as Parker said, not a single Terrier played well (see above) not just the goalies.Special Teams: DThe special teams stats were the second-most deceiving Friday night. BU’s power play, which ran at an anemic 11.1 percent entering the game, actually performed decently well as it scored on 20 percent of its chances with the man advantage. However, all of BU’s power-play tallies again came in the anomaly that was the third period. Plus, the Terriers had a grand total of 15 (!) power-play opportunities. Eight of those came in the first two periods, with BU proving to be unsuccessful on all eight power-play chances on just five shots. At one point, BC had scored more goals when BU had the extra man than the Terriers did. As for the penalty kill – once a BU strength – the Terriers allowed BC to go 3-for-5 in the opening two frames before finishing 3-for-8.X-Factor: Puck dropThis is usually where we point to one aspect of the game that really turned the tide one way or the other. For this game, it was the second the puck hit the ice. It was then that it became increasingly obvious that the Terriers never had a chance Friday night. BC scored early – Carey and Jimmy Hayes scored 23 seconds apart in the game’s opening 2:27 – and often. The best thing BU can do is forget Friday ever happened, and enter Saturday’s rematch at Conte Forum with their minds clear. Otherwise, another start like Friday’s could lead to déjà vu all over again.